PaulSeward.com

Photos of Phones and Phonographs (occasionally)

Lunchtime Wildlife

I went for a walk on Brandon Hill at lunchtime today, and inspired by the Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibition in The Bristol Museum and Art Gallery I thought I’d have a sit down and see what wandered into range.  These two shots were the result.

Robin - 2009-01-08

Unknown Species - 2009-01-08

If anyone knows what species that second photo is, let me know.  I *think* it may be a female blackbird, but I suck at ornithology!

12 Responses to “Lunchtime Wildlife”

  1. Void says:

    I think it’s a thrush.

  2. n8rae says:

    it’s a crow.

  3. Stu says:

    I was thinking thrush, too.

  4. Duncan says:

    I’d agree and say it’s a thrush. Apparently blackbirds come under the family of thrushes anyway so a thrush covers it either way.
    My bird book and all images I’ve found show female blackbirds without orange legs. The front is also a bit light and spots too pronounced.

  5. Paul says:

    The “bird identifier” on http://www.rspb.org.uk seems to agree with the Thrush idea. (Note to self, include the word “bird” next time you google image search for pictures of thrushes)
    Songthrush: http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/songthrush_300_tcm9-148968.jpg
    Juvenile Blackbird: http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/blackbird_juv_300_tcm9-139612.jpg is the closest blackbird, but as Duncan says – no orange legs

  6. Colin Morey says:

    NIce captures, but I think you would benefit from a slightly narrower depth of field on the robin…
    I don’t have my RSPB book with me, but my first thought was a thrush.

  7. Paul says:

    I would benefit slightly from a lens that could manage better than F5.6 at that end of the zoom range yes ;-)

  8. Colin Morey says:

    :P what lens were you using?

  9. Paul says:

    The 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens. Not really the ideal birdwatching lens :-)
    My only other lens is a 50mm f/1.8 prime, also not ideal for this sort of thing. The 70-200mm f/2.8 is still on the shopping list.

  10. Colin Morey says:

    Ah, for some reason i thought you had a longer lens. You must have managed to get quite close to it to get that shot or is it heavily cropped?

  11. Stu says:

    “The 70-200mm f/2.8 is still on the shopping list.”

    Is that for _after_ you win the lottery? :)

  12. Paul says:

    I was sat at one end of a park bench, the robin sat on the other end, not a lot of crop required at that distance with a 135mm :-)
    And that lens isn’t so much after I win the lottery, as after I’ve spent all my money doing up a house which is almost worth less than I paid for it! Yay! Home ownership!

wordpress theme based on zenphoto