Comments on: Direct Hit http://www.paulseward.com/blog/20100113/direct-hit/ Finding his photographic feet, one photo at a time Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:28:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Paul http://www.paulseward.com/blog/20100113/direct-hit/comment-page-1/#comment-557 Paul Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:43:13 +0000 http://www.paulseward.com/blog/?p=870#comment-557 I suppose you're right. Looking at the exif data, it looks like it was shot at 1/640th at ISO800, which would be 1/320th at ISO400, 1/160th at ISO200 or 1/80th at ISO100 (far too slow) I normally like to keep my ISO bellow 400 if I can, but at ISO200 I don't think it would have been quick enough to freeze the moment. I suppose you’re right. Looking at the exif data, it looks like it was shot at 1/640th at ISO800, which would be 1/320th at ISO400, 1/160th at ISO200 or 1/80th at ISO100 (far too slow)

I normally like to keep my ISO bellow 400 if I can, but at ISO200 I don’t think it would have been quick enough to freeze the moment.

]]> By: Jonathan http://www.paulseward.com/blog/20100113/direct-hit/comment-page-1/#comment-556 Jonathan Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:21:10 +0000 http://www.paulseward.com/blog/?p=870#comment-556 Maybe it's lucky you shot at a higher ISO, as it apparently allowed you to freeze the moment in time! Maybe it’s lucky you shot at a higher ISO, as it apparently allowed you to freeze the moment in time!

]]>